The Silent Killer in Plain Sight:

Reading the

Warning Signs in Your Cap Table

 
Author Photo

By Rafael Karamainan
Founder and Managing Partner at Lendity

 

 

A company’s capitalization table is way more than a mere spreadsheet, it’s the architectural blueprint of its financial future, a moral pact between its stakeholders, and the very DNA of its corporate body. It encodes not just ownership, but power dynamics, incentive structures, and future possibilities. At Lendity, when we underwrite companies for growth capital, this document is one of the first and most critical items we analyze.

Too often, what we find isn't a blueprint for a sound structure, but a design for a controlled demolition. Like a house built on a fractured foundation, these companies carry structural weaknesses that become apparent only when they try to scale or seek a sophisticated capital partner. This is the "broken cap table," and from our perspective, it's one of the most significant liabilities a growing company can have.

 

The Anatomy of a Broken Cap Table

A broken cap table rarely happens overnight. It’s the result of successive rounds of fundraising where short-term needs overshadow long-term consequences. When this DNA becomes corrupted, the organism itself becomes diseased. The symptoms are classic and devastating.

 

The Preference Stack Pyramid Scheme

Liquidation preferences were designed as investor protection, but in their extreme forms, they've evolved into something more sinister. Think of it as a Jenga tower: each new financing round with aggressive terms pulls a critical block from the base, leaving the entire structure fragile. This creates a "preference stack" pyramid, where founders and early employees sit at the bottom, crushed under the weight of accumulated preferences. We've seen companies where investors have 2x, 3x, or even participating preferences, the ultimate "double-dip" where they get their money back and a share of the remaining pie.

The result? A company that raised CHF 10 million with aggressive terms might need to exit for CHF 40 million just for common shareholders to see a dime. It creates a moral hazard where a modest but life-changing exit for the team is rejected because it doesn’t clear the towering preference stack.

 

Dead Equity & Dormant Stakeholders

A related symptom is the accumulation of "dead equity." This refers to significant ownership held by stakeholders who are no longer active in creating value, a dormant co-founder who left years ago, an early advisor whose contribution has long since passed, or an accelerator whose impact has faded. This dead weight not only fails to contribute to future growth but also demotivates the active team, who see precious equity sitting idle.

 
Dormant Stakeholders
Stakeholders who are no longer active in creating value—for example, a co-founder who left years ago, or an early advisor whose role has long since ended.
Dead Equity
Equity held by inactive stakeholders. This equity sits idle, failing to contribute to future growth and demotivating the active team who see valuable ownership locked away.
 

The Valuation Trap

High valuations feel like victories, but they're often worthless ones. That eye-watering valuation from your Series B might have impressed the press, but it also creates a ceiling your company must shatter before most stakeholders make money. We call this the "valuation trap": when your last round's price becomes a millstone around your company's neck, often forcing you to accept the aggressive preference terms mentioned above just to justify the headline number.

 
A Ceiling That Must Be Broken
High valuations feel like victories, but they create a ceiling your company must shatter before most stakeholders see any returns. The impressive headline numbers often hide significant challenges beneath the surface.
A Millstone Around Your Neck
Your last round's valuation becomes a burden that weighs down future decisions. Companies often accept aggressive preference terms just to justify high valuations, leading to a dangerous cycle of financial risk and misalignment.
 

Gridlock by Veto and Fragmentation

Every investor wants a voice, but this can lead to two forms of paralysis. The first is the Veto Rights Gridlock, where we've witnessed boards paralyzed by overlapping protective provisions. One investor can block a sale, another can prevent new financing, a third controls key hires.

The second is a Fragmented Cap Table. If a company has dozens of small angel investors, achieving the consensus needed for critical decisions becomes an exercise in herding cats. This fragmentation, even without explicit veto rights, can create a de facto gridlock that slows the company down at the moments it can least afford it.

 
Veto Rights Gridlock
Every investor wants a voice, but this can lead to paralysis. We've witnessed boards locked by overlapping protective provisions: one investor blocks a sale, another prevents new financing, a third controls key hires. Too many vetoes can freeze critical decisions.
Fragmented Cap Table
A company with dozens of small angel investors faces an exercise in herding cats. Achieving consensus for critical decisions becomes nearly impossible. Even without explicit veto rights, excessive fragmentation can create de facto gridlock that stalls progress right when speed matters most.
 

The Underwriter's Perspective: An Acid Test for Health

When we evaluate a company, we are fundamentally assessing its long-term viability. A broken cap table is a primary indicator of internal conflict and structural risk. Here are the key questions we consider, and that every founder should ask themselves:

 

Lendity Underwriting Acid Test

The Founder "In-the-Money" Test
Akin to options trading, are the founders’ common shares actually "in-the-money"? Founders almost always accept sub-market salaries, with their true reward being the value of their equity. We analyze whether their common stock holds tangible financial value after the full liquidation preference stack is accounted for. If a realistic exit would leave the founders with little to nothing, their primary financial incentive is gone. An "out-of-the-money" founder is a critical risk, as their motivation may wane or they may be pushed to take desperate, "hail-mary" risks to create value for themselves, a clear misalignment with the stable growth we look for.
The Exit Math Test
At what realistic exit valuation do other common shareholders (employees) start seeing meaningful returns? If the number is astronomical, the incentive structure for the entire team is broken.
The Incentive Test
Do your key employees and senior leaders own enough to be truly motivated by an exit? If they own fractions of a percent, you've transformed them from owners into renters.
The Control Test
How many individual stakeholders can block a major corporate decision like a sale or financing? If it's more than one or two, the company is at risk of gridlock.
The Preference Test
Add up all liquidation preferences. If the total exceeds 50% of your company's most optimistic, realistic exit value, the cap table is upside down.
 

A clean bill of health on these questions signals that a company is built on a foundation of fairness and strategic foresight, qualities essential for sustainable growth.

 

The Path to Rehabilitation

A broken cap table, while damaging, is not always a terminal diagnosis. We recognize that sophisticated solutions exist. A full recapitalization can reset the structure, though it requires painful negotiations. Strategic share buybacks can clean up dead equity. In some cases, a new founder-focused ESOP can be used to re-incentivize a leadership team that has been overly diluted. Acknowledging that these paths exist is a sign of a company's maturity and its commitment to fixing its foundation.

 

The Importance Strategic Financing Choices

The path to a broken cap table is paved with dilutive funding rounds. This is why the choice of capital is so critical. While equity is essential for early-stage ventures, a relentless pursuit of it can lead to the very problems we've outlined. Strategic, non-dilutive capital allows founders to maintain control and preserve ownership for their team. It's a sign of financial sophistication and a commitment to building long-term, enterprise-wide value.

 

The Choice Before You

Every financing decision is a moral choice disguised as a financial one. You're choosing between preservation and dilution, between alignment and conflict. For founders who understand that ownership structure is destiny, there's a better path. At Lendity, we believe a healthy, aligned cap table is the ultimate indicator of a company built to last. It signals that the leadership values fairness and is focused on sustainable success—the very foundation upon which great companies are built.

 

Build smarter. Scale faster. Give up less.
Join 400+ founders getting our monthly insights on capital and growth.

 
 

Learn more about Funding Strategies

 

Want to know more about our growth finance solutions?